Talk:Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Acute_disseminated_encephalomyelitis article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.
Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add {{User:LinkBot/suggestions/Acute_disseminated_encephalomyelitis}} to this page. — LinkBot 10:41, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Review articles to track down
[edit]Gupte 2003 Hynson 2001 Leake 2004 Anlar 2003 Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Confusing sentence
[edit]"The mortality rate may be as high as 5%, however full recovery is seen in 50 to 75% of cases with increase in survival rates up to 70 to 90% with figures including minor residual disability as well." Wow this is confusing. If mortality rate is %5, how are the survival rates 70-90% instead of 95%? How is it a full recovery if the figures include minor residual disability? Kmcafert (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
It's not that confusing. Firstly, you need to understand that the numbers come from different studies - so there will be some differences in the numbers, and comparing them literally will give you a headache (this is why some of the percentages are given as ranges). Anyways - 5% mortality does mean 95% survival - you're right. Of that 95%, full recovery is seen in 50-70%. Of the remaining cases, some will have minor residual disability - adding them in gives the 70-90%. However, you neglected to think about the survivors that have moderate to severe residual deficits.66.49.251.33 (talk) 01:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050520080804/http://www.myelitis.org:80/adem.htm to http://www.myelitis.org/adem.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Causes, questionable citations
[edit]Under the "causes" header, several vaccines are listed as linked to ADEM.
The cited source from Kania et al cites an a review article which lists the vaccines in a reference box, but which doesn't discuss them in the text of the article and which doesn't cite a source for those vaccines being implicated.
Given that the Kania paper goes on to say that larger studies show no link between vaccines and ADEM, I think their being listed under "causes" gives them undue weight, at least phrased as it currently is. Unless a more reliable source can be found I think they should be excluded or the passage re-written to emphasize the lack of a clear link. DigitalPants (talk) 23:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)